Reno Streetcar Concept Gaining Traction

by Mike Van Houten / Aug 6, 2015

When I first started this blog, one of the first big stories I covered was RTC's long-range plan for South Virginia Street, and the process of converting it into a Transit-Oriented Corridor. Transit-Oriented Development, or TOD for short, has remained a hot topic for  years now. The concept of a TOD centers around creating a transit-rich corridor that promotes (usually) dense development along the corridor where people live, work, shop and play, thus reducing the amount of cars on the road, and instead favoring transit options like RAPID lines, light rail, trolleys, and the like.

Light rail was always in the long range vision of RTC. There was a method to their madness when they built the platform-style RAPID stations along Virginia Street and Center Street. The stations were built to double as light-rail stations when the time came to make the switchover to something with a bit more tourist-appeal and capacity.

The Reno Streetcar Coalition thinks that time is now.

Check out a regional snapshot below of who has streetcars, who has light rail, and the cities currently in the planning stages of adding such services, courtesy the Reno Streetcar Coalition.

The arguments for a streetcar system in Midtown and downtown are convincing.

Studies have shown that streetcars/light rail;

- Promotes dense, mixed use, pedestrian-friendly building near transit systems
- Reduces travel between living, working and shopping activities 20-40%
- Attracts a different rider than bus systems, just as the RAPID bus system has attracted different ridership (more tourists) than other traditional bus lines.
- Stimulates economic revitalization with investment 12 to 60 times the cost of putting it in.
- Creates urban environment and a sense of place attractive to millennials
- Can lower infrastructure cost
- Reduces air pollution and energy consumption

To get an idea of the scale between a light rail and trolley/street car, let's take a look at a cross section:

The Planned Route

So where will it go initially? Let's take a look.

Serving key regional hubs now…

  • Education (University of Nevada)
  • Downtown Reno
  • Midtown

And in the future

  • South (resorts, Convention Center, shopping)
  • Southeast (Renown Regional Medical Center, resort, Reno/Tahoe International Airport)
  • Downtown Sparks

How Will It Be Designed and Installed?

The rail can easily be installed in existing street lanes, and could be installed in conjunction with the South Virginia Street Rehabilitation Project when much of Virginia Street will be replaced with a new street.

Upon completion of street design for South Virginia Street Rehabilitation Project, the Coalition in conjunction with RTC will identify and select funding and financing options, and potentially start construction in conjunction with the 2017 Virginia Street Rehabilitation Project.

The streetcars will be designed to be self-powered with renewable energy with no electrical rail or overhead guide-wires required.

The cost, according to the Reno Streetcar Coalition, is marginal.  With 2.4 miles of track affected by the Virginia Street replacement project (1.2 miles each way between Liberty and Plumb) the cost could be as low as $4.8 million ($2 million/mile depending on amount of reinforcement and pouring method) for this section. 

The remaining rail segments would be installed by retrofitting 2.3 miles (4.6 miles in both directions) of streets for approximately $14.2 million.

Having no overhead electrical system and no sub-station modifications reduces costs significantly.

So How Would a Public-Private Partnership Work?

According to the Reno Street Car Coalition, capital costs can come from:

  • Federal grant (50%)
  • Converting roadway impact fee to fixed guide-way transit impact fee in Virginia Street area
  • Advertising revenues
  • Private sector self assessment in Virginia Street corridor for matching funds

Operations and maintenance costs can come from:

  • RTC funds used for service being replaced (Sierra Spirit and Ride)
  • Fares
  • Advertising revenues
  • Taxes currently used and/or available for transit (e.g., gas and sales tax)
  • Private sector self assessment in Virginia Street corridor
  • Not-For-Profit private entity can finance, construct, own and lease to RTC to operate

So who supports the idea of a streetcar in Midtown/Downtown/University? Nearly everyone who has a stake in downtown and midtown, including Basin Street Properties, Marmot Investments, Peppermill, Nevada Museum of Art, E-Dawn, University of Nevada Reno, Washoe County, Reno Aces, the RSCVA, and more.

This is an idea that could actually gain traction and happen, if the right people support it and push it forward.

What are your thoughts? Ready for a streetcar/trolley in Midtown/Downtown? Check out the Reno Streetcar Coalitions' web site and sign up for updates. They also have a great report on Transit Oriented Development.  I'm not buying the argument that Reno isn't big enough yet for one...because Reno's first original trolley line opened Thanksgiving Day, 1904, when Reno and Sparks were much, much smaller. Check out this fascinating article on the history of Reno's prior trolley system, and a cool clickable high rez map below.

Post your comments
  • August 6, 2015 - 12:52:30 PM

    If the current buses don't attract the desired ridership, spend the money on nicer buses. At least they can be flexible about the routes they drive and don't require dedicated infrastructure. Buses can run on natural gas or electric if desired. If privatizing the public transit system is the solution, that can be done with buses too. Streetcars are a solution from a past century. We have better options available now.

  • August 6, 2015 - 12:58:47 PM

    This is cool. I am curious to see how much Feds will put in and what program they'll use. Also, property owners adjacent to lines stand to gain enormously. Would be interested to see how they can help pay into project a little more. Parking requirements along line could hopefully come down to 1 per unit or less and the line be complimented with bike and ped infrastructure.

  • August 6, 2015 - 1:18:02 PM

    I tend to agree with Geopower. While the trolleys are cool, most of the same effect can be accomplished (with much less permanency and cost) with boutique, smaller busses. . Once the mentioned trolley lines are in place, movement around them is haphazard. If the look is the goal, get trolley looking or themed smaller busses that can easily navigate the proposed routes.

  • August 6, 2015 - 1:59:21 PM

    The flexibility argument people against the idea of rail-based transit often use is actually an argument FOR rail-based transit. In this case, the proposed streetcar route is a route along the most well-used, well-established transit route in the region, in an area the city is investing in increasing density and intensity. This corridor is thus the best target for increasing the level of transit service, and the rails show a level of public investment that tends to attract increased private investment, creating a virtuous cycle. If the costs are what the backers say they are, it's definitely something that the city should make happen.

  • August 6, 2015 - 4:53:22 PM

    This pitch still needs to demonstrate why the public expense of a fixed-route "street car" (aka light rail in most cities) is so much more justified than more and better buses at increased headways. Bonus points for not appealing to prejudice and stigma against bus riders. Also, contrary to the completely unsubstantiated theory that RTC intended streetcars to be deployed later, do realize the the new bus stations along Virginia Street and elsewhere are elevated because the bus entrance door also is elevated, which saves time without that shrill beeping sound when the bus step elevation drops to be accessible to many riders.

  • August 6, 2015 - 4:56:24 PM

    I see the vision and understand why this proposal is gaining traction. It is a common 'investment' theme right now in cities across the US, as shown by your infographic. However, take a look at the other cities and analyze the size, demographics, and general characteristics of the areas served by their respective Streetcars. You will find the cities have a higher concentration of businesses within the radius of the area served. You will also notice major attractions, like shopping malls, in close proximity. Reno's layout is unlike the other cities, and lacks the concentration of retail and service businesses to support an $10mm+ Streetcar project. And lets be real, this project is likely to double in cost, like most public projects. While I agree Reno should be forward thinking, the need for this project is not there and will not be there for quite some time. Sorry Mayor, this is not the time. Also, I think we should look at the integration of the Streetcar projects in the cities you mentioned, and how they have performed relative to their projections. One perfect example is the city of Charlotte, NC. Their Streetcar debut was December 2014. The city traffic is far worse than Reno's, and a Streetcar was highly anticipated. Charlotte also has a University near downtown, similar to Reno. Charlotte's business climate is much stronger than Reno's, and has many major corporations (Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Chiquita, Nascar, etc) headquartered downtown. They also have a unique attraction downtown called the EPICENTRE - a collection of restaurants, bars, and entertainment, all immediately adjacent to a railway, and on the proposed Streetcar route. One would extrapolate that Charlotte would be a perfect candidate for a Streetcar project. Well, not long after launch, the Streetcar has fallen far short of its expectations. Costs are higher than expected, and ridership is already declining significantly. Now, the Streetcar is nothing more than wasted grant money/ tax payer dollars and a Mayor's "legacy" cruising the streets. How sad. If this type of project doesn't work in Charlotte, its painfully obvious it won't work in Reno, either. I fear that this project will be pushed through by the politically-tied advertising machine that Reno has become, without the proper scrutiny. Who has put together the projections, and where can we see their data? I fear that our new Mayor is pushing a selfish initiative, simply to get something done and leave a mark. Do not be fooled by the smoke and mirrors, the colorful designs and graphics. Ask for facts and figures. Demand what you deserve. I support the direction and growth of Reno, and realize it takes investment to continue to grow and attract new business. But this is an investment with zero ROI and an extremely limited value-added proposition, as there is already a public service that meets this transportation need.

  • August 6, 2015 - 5:59:04 PM

    To "I like to ride", http://www.downtownmakeover.com/10-6-09-Reno-Bus-Rapid-Transit.asp in 2009 RTC presented to the city council their plan for Virginia Street as a transit corridor, including Phase 3, which was light rail. It wasn't an unsubstantiated theory. And they indeed designed the platforms to be light-rail friendly. Their own words. This has been talked about for over a decade now. Also, what does the mayor have to do with this? I believe this was a presentation from a group of business owners. I understand the BRT vs. Streecar pros and cons. I think our RAPID buses are cool, but still look too much like buses compared to the design of other BRTs I've seen to generate a 'cool factor' for tourists. Regarding facts and figures, you can read all the facts and figures you want in this 400-megabyte PDF which has ridership numbers up the ying yang. http://renocitynv.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1300&Inline=True

  • August 6, 2015 - 6:05:22 PM

    Where are the Carano's on the list of supporters? The Little Nugget? Whiney Peak? This scheme does not connect "downtown" to anything - it bypasses our crumbling casino core for our dainty UNR students who want to get to Midtown to drink illegally and can't be bothered running the gauntlet. I know this proposal is being presented with the best of intentions by well meaning civic leaders, but it is just bonehead stupid. A slow trolley and Rapid buses both require "fat" travel lanes where we are already out of room down to Vassar/Center/Holcomb. RTC can't even figure out if the 2' curb and gutter is available for parking on their various schemes. Can you imagine adding fixed rail to the melange and hold your breath until ANYTHING gets accomplished?

  • August 7, 2015 - 10:04:17 AM

    I think this would be a good idea in perhaps another decade, but more important right now is to increase the service we have now. We desperately need commuter services out to Spanish Springs and Fernley, as well as improved service to and from Carson as well as to the North Valleys, not to mention the multiple areas within the main valley that are lacking adequate service. We need to take care of that before making pie in the sky upgrades to already well served areas.

  • August 7, 2015 - 11:57:42 AM

    One of the most successful streetcar systems in the country is in Portland. It went live in 2001 at a cost of $12.4M/mile, or $16.7M per mile in today's dollars. With a 4.7 mile route this project would then be something north of $78 million dollars - hardly a "marginal" cost. I am a huge fan of these systems but it is important to be realistic about the costs. These things aren't cheap.

  • August 7, 2015 - 1:50:07 PM

    there is enough ugly is downtown Reno now. Please do not add more.

  • August 11, 2015 - 3:44:14 PM

    I ain't paying for a street car for homeless people to defecate and sleep on. Just drive your damn car. Total waste of money.

  • September 29, 2015 - 12:10:55 PM

    The future is now reclaiming The Public Square for all towns and cities. We cannot keep supporting the sprawl cancer. We all need to talk and reverse adding a new 209.000 births a day which helps fuel humanities problems. Together we can work together and be part of this sustainability or green paradigm shift. Live healthier and green, Bill Zaffer Tucson, Arizona

  • March 2, 2020 - 7:17:01 PM

    Hello, I just started working again on thi' must do' project....already invisioned this over 20 years ago Go to Tim Elam downtown trolley, streetcar etc. should still be on the net....anyway, Propose going to city counsel next meeting and request to stop all work temporarily until project development and proposal take place (say 30 day hold) the community coalition (us) go to Tesla, Elon MUsk to develop a battery/solar powered streetcar system to be installed from downtown to as far south as affordable.....1st phase Virginia and Plumb.....est. $1,000.000. a mile /est. THIS IS A PIVOTAL MOVE FOR THE FUTURE OF RENO!!!! Let me know how you would like to proceed,,,,best of luck to us! Tim

MENU